Hotel Europa

Today's news, at least in the usual suspects (BBC, Guardian, Independent) was Amnesty International's parring of the European Union for only taking in around 55,000 Syrian refugees (out of 2 million). They are calling for an end to maritime  border protection which protects Europe, and for more aid from Europe to refugee camps in the Middle East.

This is such a non-story I don't even know where to begin.

For a start, don't bite the hand that feeds you. If the people had their say, there would be no refugees in Europe at all. I can honestly say that about every single European nation. Overpopulation is critical in the developed West, and by January 35 million from the East can potentially join in on that. We have welfare leeches as far as the eye can see:

 

Oh yes. What do you get the benefit-cheating walking postbox who has everything? Hair care for nobody to see.

And we don't even have room for the honest ones. Schools are crammed and failing, with huge chunks of public budget going on interpreters. I heard somebody say "You can have a welfare state or open borders. You decide". It couldn't be more true. Attlee set up the NHS to build Jerusalem in England's green and verdant land. You can't perfect what you have if you add to the problem. Meanwhile, we become like Jerusalem in another way - divided, mistrusting parallel societies claiming their part as "our land". However, 50 years of immigration mismanagement shows quite a simpler case for whose land it is, compared to the eternal quagmire in the Holy Land.

And while on the subject of the Levant - if the Syrians are in camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, can't they show us this "Ummah" spirit of Muslim co-operation which they always boast about? As we always are told, Turkey is a free and democratic country fir for EU membership. Lebanon and Jordan are no culture shock and have remained largely peaceful in recent times. Ooh, and shall we move a little further into the desert: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and the UAE. Surely these bastions of pure Islam can give a brother a hand? These nations in which no citizen pays any tax, and have enough cash spare to buy all of our football clubs and build gargantuous carbuncles of mosques.

A civil war is nothing more than rolling a six to move off the Third World. Why do we see so many rafts come into Sicily, but Southern Europe is one of the most homogenous parts of Europe. Why do tthey not touch base 50 miles across from Syria, in EU Cyprus? It's about money. All of the Italians who observed a minute's silence for their drowned invaders were duped -  within one day, the Eritreans granted refuge in moderately wealthy Rome went AWOL. These aren't people fleeing to safety, democracy or religious freedom: Italy offers that just as much as the UK, Germany or Sweden. They just want to scavenge off hard-working people.

And it's the hard-working people who suffer. International aid is ring-fenced from budget cuts, meaning that £500 million have gone to these "desperate" people. That money could have fixed our education system. Every day, in my home town, I see a homeless man in his sleeping bag outside the bright lights of Starbuck's. Now I'm not particularly one for socialism, but if you're going to have it, use it to help your own first. It's pretty obvious when you look at these people's conditions and the track record that our government have, that it's gone for arming the rebels. Yep, as the government assures us that it's going to stop Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and on our streets, it's pushing for it in Syria. While so many of us are homeless or on the brink. While so many of us are dying of diseases on the brink of a cure. While our education lags behind Eastern Europe.

And we're all so terrible because we won't let foreign people come halfway across the world totake more money.

Notice the correlation between wealth and refugees? It's hardly the countries closest to the Third World, is it?

Sweden's 81,000 looks moderate. But is it had the population of France, the UK or Italy, this would be around 480,000. That's less than germany, but if Sweden had their population, we would see it have 650,000 refugees.

What the schools are teaching our children

School just ain't school in England anymore.

Whatever happened to learning your ABC, then sentence structure, then Shakespeare?
Whatever happened to learning to count, then multiplication, then calculus?

No, because learning those things in a naive young mind won't lead them to vote Labour in the future. In fact, more education will no doubt prevent them from being a mouth-breathing, left-loving, England-hating slobberer. There have to be more important things to drill into a child's head.

Drilling Islam into a schoolchild's head is difficult because of prior legislation. For example, the 1944 Education Act means that anybody can be withdrawn from religious education if they so choose. In 1988, the Education Reform Act said that the majority of RE in England had to be based on Christianity. So how do you get the message across if children won't attend the lessons?

Well, Labour had the dandy idea to nurture a generation which would vote for them by putting religious multiculturalism in all lessons - including PE.

Even Michael Gove, who with his calls for no retakes at exam level and reintroducing Latin, has fallen to the pressure from the lefty teachers whom he represents. Maybe he forgot what his lying "Conservative" Party said in 2012.

The new history curriculum now omits the Battle of Waterloo, but in a series of optional World History units, includes Islamic history. No other religion's history is mentioned. Well surely as this is History and not Religious Education, the true story of Mohammed would have to be told, or will we get the same flying horse to seven heavens and seven hells lark? As far as I know, there is no option to withdraw from History...

He no doubt came to such a decision from the lobbying of the sinister Muslim Council of Britain who said that his History currculum had no mention of Muslims or Islam. They called for "anybody who cares about the education of our children" to moan with them for the dubious, one-sided perspective of the Muslim contribution to Europe to be mentioned. God, how many Polish groups were lobbying? There' s a lot of Poles in this country, and they made such contributions as King John III Sobieski who won the 1683 Battle of Vienna to save the West from ... you know who! I guess the Poles realise that they are living in England!

And yesterday, we had the delightful dhimmi Head Lynn Small, of Littleton Green Community School in South Staffs, who in the equally menacing Comic Sans font blackmailed and hectored the parents of the kids at the school (which according to OFSTED, "requires improvement"):

Has she read this? As President Eisenhower said during the Civil Rights Era, it's counter-productive to force people to like each other. It makes more animosity. Society is not political. Let it work itself out.

Viva la Revolución.
Viva Inglaterra

The Muslim Council of Britain - what they want to do to our schools

http://www.mcb.org.uk/downloads/Schoolinfoguidance.pdf

72 pages. Ever get the feeling that if you have to make 72 pages of advice on your cultural needs to a school, you should search for a country more in keeping with your way of life?

It is absolutely abhorrent that we all learn "cultural sensititvity" - which is mostly just on Islam - instead of learning to accomodate people who DON'T have the choice to act that way. The physically handicapped. The mentally disabled or ill. The blind and the deaf. People with autism. Or what about, in our schools, we give kids the literacy and numeracy that they need to succeed, as well as non-religious citizenship education, and sporting and creative opportunities! Enough with this shite!

This is the MCB's guidelines which they want sent to every Local Education Authority in the country to counter "Islamophobia" (hell, it's pretty tough to say that word with a straight face). Page 11 has a big quote on how European civilisation owes everything to Arabs (not NECESSARILY Muslims). Can these liars go five fucking minutes without propagating lies to us?  This sinister approach continues:

It is important for educators to appreciate and understand the centrality of knowledge and

education in the philosophy of Islam and the substantial Muslim contributions to European

and world civilisation. Within the educational context it is important to explore opportunities

to emphasise on common and shared aspects of the Islamic and European civilisations in

various fields such as religion, culture, linguistic and intellectual exchanges.

Huh? Well, I can see the point in learning about the contributions of all civilisations, but why just Islam? What does the scholarly work of long-dead  people who happened to also be Muslims have to do with Muslims in our country now?

On page 15, they mention "Islamophobia" (SMIRK) and how it was caused by 9/11 and 7/7 - and then allowed to continue because English schools have communal changing rooms (as well as swimming lessons in general!) and no halal dinners! What have they been smoking?

Now we've got more - to stop the Muslim underachievement in schools they need to learn more about their history. That'll integrate them good. And now, they say that they are superior to the needs of other religions:

We recognise that local authorities and schools, as part of their general strategies, do attempt

to address the diverse religious and cultural needs of their pupils and try to respond to the

communities they serve. Although there are many similarities with other faith groups, many of

the issues facing Muslim pupils are different in kind and in degree. Schools need to be better

informed and have greater and more accurate appreciation of their Muslim pupil’s needs

Hmmm...so we can't have a more diverse school by celebrating Caribbean Carnival, learning about Hindu philosophers or the history of Jews in Britain...we need Islam, Islam and more Islam.

On page 31, we have advice for schools not to schedule sex education or swimming for ANYBODY during Ramadan. Surely as a multicultural country we should be inclusive and ban everybody from doing an activity when one child has a religious opposition to it? Let's do absolutely nothing! That's education!

On page 39, dance, which is compulsory PE, is told to be banned for a "more suitable option" and if that is not possible, parental requests to be excused. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

Page 50, Modern Foreign Languages. Surely the least likely subject to be Islamified? Nope.

Arabic, the language of the Qur’an, holds an important status for all Muslims regardless of their

linguistic backgrounds. All Muslim children learn to read and recite the Qur’an in Arabic, and are

required to perform their prayers and supplications in this language. Offering Arabic as an option

in both primary and secondary schools would provide Muslim children with wider linguistic skills

and offers greater access to their religious and cultural heritage, thus giving them a stronger

sense of self-esteem and achievemen
And not even a mention of the same options to others to learn Hebrew, Sanskrit, Latin or Old Church Slavonic. Surely this can be done at home or place of worship?

Page 53: Drama:

Muslim pupils should not be expected to participate in drama or musical presentations

associated with celebrating aspects of other religions, such as nativity plays or Diwali, as

some of these are likely to involve playing roles which are considered to be inconsistent with

Islamic beliefs and teachings.

 

OH I GET IT! WE HAVE TO LEARN YOUR RELIGION BUT IT'S AGAINST YOUR RELIGION TO LEARN OUR RELIGION!

In addition, the music section encourages all pupils to perform "Nasheeds" sung Quranic verses.

And to top it off, if you haven't been culturally sensitised enough, you can go on a three-hour workshop, no doubt to fund the MCB more.

This entire paper is  joke and no teacher should read or obey it. It denies basic human rights to non-Muslims to make the Muslims have the most privilege. It is discriminatory and un-English.

The BBC's war on Christ

Well, if we needed ANY more proof of the BBC nailing their colours to the mast over which religion they prefer, we've bloody got it now.

Evaluating the numbers of people killed in mass hate crimes is a justifiably sensitive issue. So much so that there are jurisdictions when propagating a lower figure can end up in a jail sentence. The BBC, as a neutral public broadcaster is getting into hot water here. This is the kind of article that made Nick Griffin or David Irving famous. It has the potential to cause anguish to people - although those people are going to be Christian and (in this country, at least) mostly white. So it's fair do's.

This article turns into a massive coat rack that takes the original point and converts it into analysis of the civil war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which counts for 80% of Christian martyrs due to old census data showing that 20% of that country is Christian. This mistake is then used to denounce the idea that Muslims are murdering Christians for their faith.

Near the beginning of the article, two recent incidents are mentioned - a massacre at a Coptic wedding in Cairo, and a church bombing in Pakistan. The religion of the perpetrators is...absent.

As the Congo war is dubbed by the article as "Christians killing Christians", who actually is the religion killing the most Christians? I think, from the fact that the BBC won't give us the answer, it might be...

But it's all swings and roundabouts. We have genocide and massacres in our own country, as we well know!

The hypocrisy of multiculturalism

Religious discrimination takes different forms in different cities. For example, in Bingham, Notts., Muslims may have a cross covered in ham put outside their house by a 13-year old. In another example, non-Muslims are totally banned from entering Mecca.

 

Oh, the great tolerance of the religion of peace!

What would be said if this was anywhere in the West?

We would be called:

• Fascist
• Nazi
• Far-right
• Chauvinistic
• Ethnocentrist
• Intolerant
• Racist
• Islamophobic

Respect is a two-way street. You can't bloody expect to be so intolerant of whites and Christians and then expect them to respect you at all. It says something of the failed West that the largest mosque in Europe is in Rome, the holiest city to Catholics. Meanwhile, Constantinople, the holiest city in Eastern Orthodoxy, has been occupied by Islam since 1453, and Alexandria, the holiest city of Coptic Orthoodoxy, since 642. What would be done if we were occupying Mecca? The Palestine-loving left brigade have a lot to answer for there.

So, as they would say:

"Mecca is a closed and itolerant city. It needs more diversity. It needs churches to bring it into the modern globalised, multicultural society. Only then, from the enrichment of Christian immigrants, will the people improve and become more tolerant"

It sounds stupid when it's said from the other side, eh, lefties?

BBC - good, unbiased reporting

Yesterday a scary incident happened in South London. I first found out about it through the Daily Mail.

Was that the Mail stirring the story and making things up? Time for a cross-reference. I wonder what the left-wing, anti-racism Daily Mirror say:

Crikey! This is getting a bit convincing now! I have not just a right-wing but a left-wing source telling me that somebody was attempting a genocide in London yesterday! But I won't know for sure until I check the 100% neutral, 100% factual and unbiased Auntie Beeb.

Aah! Silly racist me, letting the media tell me otherwise! It was just an everyday case of a "man" doing an "attempted murder" in London. Happens everyday. Nothing serious. It couldn't have been what I believed it to have been - the BBC always cover the brutal hate crimes which occur in racist Britain.

It really makes you think. How did we ever make ourselves feel guilty before we had the BBC?


The revolution will come soon.

Our veterans deserve better

On 11 November, we will remember all of those who fought to keep our country and our people free. Free from the over-revolution of Napoleon. Free from the iron fist of Hitler. Free from the Satanic evil of Bin Laden. But that's just not enough for some people, who, ironically, are the ones using our freedom of expression against it.

Open up The Guardian or listen to the BBC about the "insurgent" (leftist Newspeak for terrorist) whom our brave boys gave a bit of Best of British and sent him to Allah. What kind of perverse Anglophobic media will try to turn our loyalties against our heroes? In the week leading up to Rememberance Day? Red filth on Twitter had a go at Dawkins for criticising Islam's lack of scientifuc progress...during Ramadan! Somebody call the thought police! Got a case here of somebody not swallowing the left's view on the boundaries of polite debate!

It would downright stupid of me to blast a whole religion for the acts against our troops. But the fact that the extremists kill for a religion, which in a decent human being would lead to charity or kindness, should not be avoided. Fortress Britain fell on 22 May when Lee Rigby was executed in public in broad daylight. His cowardly assassin quoted the Koran to justify his crime, ending with "You people will never be safe". Kind of a clue to his motive. But no, the leftist toilet paper Guardian and the instantly forgettable leader of the Green Party pointed to British foreign involvement in other countries. On any other day, they would call this 'man', who was born in this country and travels to do Jihad on the passport of this country, "British". You can't have your cake and eat it. Are we invading your country or should appease your sensitivities because we are also citizens of your country?

Publicly stating an objection to wearing a poppy is the moral equivalent of having a wank in front of a group of people. It pleases you know end, repulses the others, but you don't mind. It's quite cute how these are mostly the commie and trade union types, who would have been the first into the ovens had our soldiers and seamen not socked it to the SS.

Burning the poppy in public is acceptable in this day and age. But the noisiness of it will land you a £50 fine. In revenge, an ex-soldier from Carlisle burned a Koran. The simpering judge described it as "An act of theatrical bigotry...You went out to cause maximum publicity and to cause distress". Ten weeks' jail. Sweet land of equality. Oh the freedoms which we enjoy, for what our ancestors put their lives on the fucking line for.

If we're going to punish "theatrical bigotry" and "maximum publicity", what about the two Birmingham councillors who folded their arms as the city applauded a Victoria Cross winner? Just google it. You won't be surprised by their names.

The revolution will come soon.